When the Rubberduck project was first put on GitHub, we quickly decided to use issues as our “todo list”. Right then, we knew we were going to need some label system. Since everything had started on a Stack Exchange site, labels were made to look like SE tags – and came to be used as such: our “categories” labels are all the same color: DDDDDD.
“Oh wow, that must be so boring!”, right?
A little bit, indeed. So we made the status tags red (B60205), the meta-tags almost-white (FEFEFE), subcategories dark gray (808080); then we have [support] in blue (0077AA), [up-for-grabs] in forest green (0E8A16) and [help-wanted] in bright gold (FBCA04), to catch the eye easily.
So we went on a spree and created an issue for every feature we (then) could think of, and Rubberduck was officially kicked off as a long-term project, and I felt like we were managing it ok.
Especially since we started creating milestones and assigning one to issues. One mistake you don’t want to make, is to create a Next Release milestone – before you know it it’s impossible to know what was fixed when!
So a milestone was created for the “initial release”, then for “version 1.1”. Then I created one dedicated to get parsing powered by ANTLR – milestones were no longer release dates, but now little projects within the project, being worked on as reported and discovered bugs were assigned under the release milestone.
It worked that way until.. very recently. Looking back, I’d say what didn’t work was that our releases were revisions but our milestones were minor releases – so there was an undetermined number of releases under one given milestone. “v2.0.12” is the first milestone in the repository that’s actually numbered after a revision – and against which there will be only one release.
So, to recap:
- Issues ideally describe one bug or feature request
- Milestones ideally regroup all issues to be closed for a given release
Starting with 2.0.11/12, we’re going to be shooting for monthly releases, so a new milestone should be created every month or so: Rubberduck releases have been pretty random up to this point, and with a release-per-milestone it’s going to be much easier to plan and track the “current sprint”.
Or will it? Something is missing.
That’s what the “little projects within the project” milestones should have been from the beginning: a project. On GitHub a project lets you create columns to move cards to/from, and if you add an issue as a card to your “In Progress” column, the issue page will say “In Progress in [Project]” in the side bar.. which is pretty cool!
As of yesterday, Rubberduck has two types of projects:
Things we plan and track for [every] next release
There’s two of them:
- Features tracks feature requests and enhancements to existing features.
- BugSlayer tracks all reported bugs.
These projects have columns that help plan work, and visualize everything much more easily than with the issues list:
- Requested / Reported
- Deferred / Hold
- Planned for next release
- Assigned / In Progress
Things we plan and track for some eventual release
When an important feature requires more work than can reasonably be tracked with a single issue / card in the Features project, a project board dedicated to that feature can be created to make it easier to track work and facilitate collaboration.
These projects have a “classical” set of columns:
- In Progress
Do you need all that for a small side-project? Maybe not… but I don’t see how it can hurt. Rubberduck isn’t really a small project anymore, though, but it’s still built by a handful of people that find a few spare hours to devote regularly. With the number of open issues (over 300), tracking things in the issues list was starting to feel like tracking help desk tickets with Outlook email follow-up flags – GitHub projects change everything. Heck, I think they’re making me start liking project management!